Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167 23,407 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	46.4% Average	Memory 67.6 1-Core 59.4 2-Core 83.1 45% 70 Pts	4-Core 148 8-Core 148 20% 148 Pts	64-Core 149 9% 149 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 45%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GOODRAM 120GB 5,433 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM71.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 38 41 44 38 46 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.5% Below average	Read 232 Write 216 Mixed 203 SusWrite 69.6 40% 180 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 16.3 4K Mixed 12.1 46% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 123 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 102 86% 125 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5773CHS-CF8 80CE M471B2873FHS-CF8 3GB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 533, 533 MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 9.3 23% 8 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 6.4 18% 6.33 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 24%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce 310MNvidiaBench 1%, 8,303 samples	61x

RAM
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	8x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	4x
M471B5773CHS-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 26%, 995 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16