Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel 18 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 77.8 1-Core 77.9 2-Core 155 61% 103 Pts	4-Core 275 8-Core 566 49% 420 Pts	64-Core 1,434 89% 1,434 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 5800 793 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Nvidia(10DE 0593) ≥ 4GB Ram: 4GB, Driver: 342.00 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	8.39% Terrible	Lighting 11.9 Reflection 12.8 Parallax 5.8 10% 10.2 fps	MRender 9.4 Gravity 9.7 Splatting 3.8 6% 7.63 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.39% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Dell PERC H310 1TB 470 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 78 91 86 104 103 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	58.2% Above average	Read 115 Write 89 Mixed 50.4 SusWrite 87.7 63% 85.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 163% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung-00CE M393B1G70BH0-YK0 M393B1G70BH0-YK0 M393B1G70BH0-YK0 M393B1G70BH0-YK0 M393B1K70DH0-YK0 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 48GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	MC Read 48.1 MC Write 23.1 MC Mixed 22.1 89% 31.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6.4 23% 8.07 GB/s	Latency 84.8 47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 77%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	96x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	78x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 01stBench 67%, 1,642 samples	76x

GPU
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	39x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	36x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	35x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	27x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	21x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	19x

RAM
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 79%, 545 samples	33x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	28x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 8x8GBHynix-00ADBench 87%, 150 samples	26x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $85