Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK (all builds)
Motherboard	CASPER C15B
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20150108
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '22 at 16:03
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4100M 1,320 User benchmarks, average bench 53% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Memory 77.5 1-Core 50.8 2-Core 96.5 48% 74.9 Pts	4-Core 99.9 8-Core 141 15% 120 Pts	64-Core 137 8% 137 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 61%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 181 154 154 151 148 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	56% Above average	Read 339 Write 238 Mixed 210 SusWrite 168 53% 239 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 42.7 4K Mixed 25.8 78% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 261 DQ Write 66.9 DQ Mixed 192 134% 173 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1315 CT51264BF160B.C16F 8GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 14.3 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 16.4 36% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 85.4 47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	596x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	321x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	189x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	102x
MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,038 samples	84x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	36x

RAM
CT102464BF160B.M16 2x8GBCrucialBench 51%, 9,135 samples	130x
M2S8G64CB8HB5N-DI 1x8GBNanyaBench 30%, 565 samples	80x
CT102464BF160B.M16 1x8GBCrucialBench 26%, 4,731 samples	73x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16