Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 X 920-$90 998 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	67.3% Good	Memory 94.4 1-Core 84.8 2-Core 161 69% 113 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 294 33% 259 Pts	64-Core 296 18% 296 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 68%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 139GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 239 240 240 238 239 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.8% Good	Read 249 Write 240 Mixed 231 SusWrite 240 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 41.1 4K Mixed 28.2 91% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 194 146% 194 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 124%
Clover CN-M101MBB 1TB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 931GB free Firmware: 2AR10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 107 107 107 108 107 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Read 105 Write 54 Mixed 56.9 SusWrite 107 59% 80.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT351S6EFR8C-PB 80AD HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	39% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 10.7 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 12.1 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 58.8 68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 5870AMDBench 9%, 3,040 samples	12x
GeForce GTX 460MNvidiaBench 6%, 3,887 samples	4x
GeForce GTX 480MNvidiaBench 9%, 34 samples	3x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8C-PB 80AD HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 8GBUnknownBench 35%, 8 samples	3x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	2x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 8,481 samples	2x

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $290

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16