HP Pavilion x2 Detachable

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 60% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion x2 Detachable  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8181
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1280 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160926
Uptime31.6 Days
Run DateSep 13 '17 at 22:37
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User JOR-User
Background CPU 40%
CPU Throttled 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core m3-6Y30
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Memory 63.3
1-Core 43.5
2-Core 74.4
39% 60.4 Pts
4-Core 89.1
8-Core 102
12% 95.4 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 515 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 8181) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4542
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
4.4% Terrible
Lighting 4.43
Reflection 6.77
Parallax 4.5
4% 5.23 fps
MRender 6.71
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 9.65
6% 6.92 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.4%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-000H1 128GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT21H1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 460
Write 57.1
Mixed 117
45% 212 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 8.03
45% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 61.3
DQ Write 18.2
DQ Mixed 8.65
14% 29.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9CCNNNBPTBLBR-NUD 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
47.6% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 17.6
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion x2 Detachable Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion x2 Detachable

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback