Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 18% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP hp workstation xw6200 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 08B8h
Memory	1.5 GB free of 6.00049 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20051222
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '17 at 16:52
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon 3.00GHz 6 User benchmarks, average bench 28% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Memory 31.8 1-Core 9.5 2-Core 14.4 14% 18.6 Pts	4-Core 20.7 8-Core 20.4 3% 20.5 Pts	64-Core 21.3 1% 21.3 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1400 238 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Nvidia(10DE 0243) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 307.45 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.32% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 0.85 Parallax 0.03 0% 0.49 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.32% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ5PA128HMCD-01000 128GB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 45GB free Firmware: AXM0601Q Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11950 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1010 (AF) Unknown 95 95 93 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 98 98 52 (B2) Unknown 57 57 870 (B3) Unknown 59 59 1634 (B4) Unknown 59 59 2398 (B5) Unknown 96 96 152 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 96 96 152 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 4 (BE) vendor-specific 77 77 23 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 199 199 4 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (E9) Unknown 199 199 1283 (EA) Unknown 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 575 (EC) Unknown 99 99 155 (ED) Unknown 99 99 278 (EE) Unknown 99 99 1634	17% Very poor	Read 57.3 Write 58.8 Mixed 58.5 13% 58.2 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 16 4K Mixed 6.97 34% 11.4 MB/s	DQ Read 13.7 DQ Write 25.9 DQ Mixed 5.58 8% 15 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 47%
Ibm-esxs VPR146W3-ETS10FN 147GB 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: S410 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.7% Below average	Read 63.2 Write 61.5 Mixed 55.4 45% 60 MB/s	4K Read 0.22 4K Write 0.23 4K Mixed 0.62 82% 0.36 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 38GB 3,056 User benchmarks, average bench 16% null MHz 2048, 2048, 1024, 1024, 33280 MB Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	MC Read 3.5 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 2.9 9% 3.3 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 3.1 9% 3.23 GB/s	Latency 244 16% 244 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 21%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon 3.20GHz1stBench 30%, 29 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon 3.60GHz1stBench 31%, 48 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon 3.60GHz1stBench 33%, 38 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	1x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	1x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	1x