Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4260U 870 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Memory 43.3 1-Core 32.3 2-Core 114 35% 63.2 Pts	4-Core 163 8-Core 179 22% 171 Pts	64-Core 180 11% 180 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5000 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 6,906 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Apple(106B 011B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4240 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	3.94% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 3.1 Parallax 6.5 4% 4.87 fps	MRender 5.2 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 5.3 4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.94% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung Portable SSD T5 250GB 1,970 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 216GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 310 334 273 273 269 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Read 305 Write 316 Mixed 294 SusWrite 290 68% 301 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 20.7 4K Mixed 14 51% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 84.8 DQ Write 97.5 DQ Mixed 111 78% 97.8 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x45424A3230554638454455302D474E2D4620 2x2GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	49.6% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 16.8 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 15.6 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 188 21% 188 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 5000 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 6,906 samples	73x

SSD
SD0128F PCIe 121GBAppleBench 81%, 595 samples	21x
SD0256F 251GBAppleBench 77%, 296 samples	20x
SM0256F 251GBAppleBench 84%, 272 samples	7x

RAM
0x483943434E4E4E384A544D4C41522D4E544D 2x2GBUnknownBench 49%, 215 samples	19x
0x45424A3230554638454455302D474E2D4620 2x2GBUnknownBench 49%, 67 samples	13x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	12x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16