Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive17.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T7400  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0RW199
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120430
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '22 at 02:35
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5482
CPU, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 66.4
1-Core 51.5
2-Core 102
45% 73.4 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 406
36% 305 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 200
XFX(1682 5230) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.63% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 2
2% 2.13 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2
Splatting 2
2% 2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.63%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 16 21 26 18 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.3% Very poor
Read 88.5
Write 118
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 25.3
13% 60 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 12.6
39% 9.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 86%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$32
775GB free
Firmware: 2D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 99 101 102 102 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 91.1
Write 83.1
Mixed 35.4
SusWrite 101
57% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 62%
Hitachi HDS72161 165GB
153GB free
Firmware: AB3A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 55 56 55 56 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 41.1
Write 51
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 55.5
35% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 39%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: 2E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 61 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 59.8
Write 59.5
Mixed 39.9
SusWrite 60.9
40% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.3% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 6.4
16% 5.57 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 5.4
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T7400 Builds (Compare 210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback