ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HUANANZHI
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X79
Memory	55.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191028
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 06 '22 at 21:01
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2-$142 1,083 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 74.8 1-Core 77.3 2-Core 155 60% 102 Pts	4-Core 351 8-Core 667 61% 509 Pts	64-Core 1,124 70% 1,124 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38 83,298 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 308GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR041 SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 407 311 194 208 325 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	53.5% Above average	Read 462 Write 420 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 305 67% 303 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 17 4K Mixed 0.4 39% 12.4 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 33.7 53% 101 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 92%
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB 27,523 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 43GB free Firmware: 03090004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 209 168 73 76 76 MB/s Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.6% Above average	Read 241 Write 197 Mixed 180 SusWrite 132 42% 187 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 46.1 4K Mixed 31.6 107% 35.2 MB/s	DQ Read 150 DQ Write 141 DQ Mixed 115 95% 135 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 91%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38 83,298 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 269GB free Firmware: M6CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 187 7.3 34 292 7.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	52.8% Above average	Read 467 Write 408 Mixed 393 SusWrite 154 80% 355 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 68.6 4K Mixed 0.4 82% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 121 DQ Write 7.2 DQ Mixed 0.5 16% 43 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 92%
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB 30,897 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 100GB free Firmware: UI510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 86 48 81 87 88 MB/s Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.8% Below average	Read 229 Write 180 Mixed 135 SusWrite 96.4 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 32.1 4K Mixed 16.2 69% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 71.4 DQ Mixed 41.3 44% 74.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 52%
WD WD4001FYYG 4TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3TB free Firmware: D1R5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 13 18 16 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	6.54% Terrible	Read 6.2 Write 5.5 Mixed 5.7 SusWrite 16.6 6% 8.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.54% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KG07056515-73 4x16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	98.2% Outstanding	MC Read 44.2 MC Write 37.4 MC Mixed 37.1 113% 39.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 11.2 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 90.8 44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback