Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20278

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20278  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20278 QB0
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130808
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '22 at 19:21
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 145
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 215
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 502B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.61% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 3.9
2% 3.93 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 5.6
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.61%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$34
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 33 40 55 47 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 80.1
Write 79.6
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 49.2
48% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 61%
WD Black 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$55
231GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 90 90 94 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 88.7
Write 83.4
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 91.5
60% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3170EB68F9W1600 Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.9% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 15.5
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 16.4
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20278 Builds (Compare 134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20278

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $39
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback