IBM System x -[79473AG]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory76GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 76GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIBM System x -[79473AG]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM 49Y6498
Memory72.1 GB free of 76 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121126
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '22 at 14:19
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5640
Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 76.6
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 141
58% 96.5 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 403
42% 339 Pts
64-Core 686
42% 686 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS72321 160GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B70B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 23 11 5.6 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 69
Write 79.4
Mixed 44
SusWrite 16.9
39% 52.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 42%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
50GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 52 50 53 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 84.6
Write 77.4
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 51.1
48% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 76GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback