Today's hottest deals

Dell Studio XPS 1340

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell Studio XPS 1340  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0K183D
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '22 at 06:44
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo P8600-$42
Socket 479, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Memory 67.5
1-Core 25.3
2-Core 49.3
34% 47.4 Pts
4-Core 49.7
8-Core 50.1
7% 49.9 Pts
64-Core 49.9
3% 49.9 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500M (GF 9400MG + GF 9200MGS)
Dell(1028 0271) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8633
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
0.41% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.1
0% 0.43 fps
MRender 0.8
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.41%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545032B9A 320GB
273GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB3O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 49 10 16 26 18 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 78.9
Write 76.3
Mixed 42.1
SusWrite 30.7
42% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM 15h Reserved
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
18% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 4.9
16% 5.73 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.4
14% 4.8 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 1340 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio XPS 1340

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $20
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback