Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-7395

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardMSI MS-7395  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '22 at 17:11
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$57
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
45.7% Average
Memory 75.8
1-Core 48.4
2-Core 95.3
47% 73.2 Pts
4-Core 93.5
8-Core 92.1
12% 92.8 Pts
64-Core 95.1
6% 95.1 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6610 XL
MSI(1462 9790) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 309.08
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.02% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.9
2% 1.23 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.02%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
262GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 45 43 34 50 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 72
Write 42.2
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 43.9
38% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 58%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB
1GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 8.2 2.8 4.5 3.3 1.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
9.96% Terrible
Read 27.6
Write 11.5
Mixed 14
SusWrite 5
17% 14.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
89% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.96%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
21.9% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 7 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7395 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-7395

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $57
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $155
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback