Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite C75D-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemToshiba Satellite C75D-A  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD Larne
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '22 at 04:05
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5000 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Memory 38.8
1-Core 23
2-Core 46.3
23% 36 Pts
4-Core 92.4
8-Core 92.4
12% 92.4 Pts
64-Core 90
6% 90 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330
Toshiba(1179 FA85) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.58% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 2.3
1% 2.27 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 3
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.58%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX300 120GB-$42
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M2CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 204 222 216 224 206 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 436
Write 358
Mixed 368
SusWrite 229
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 23
74% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 170
124% 163 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KN2M64-ETB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1334 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 6.3
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 208
19% 208 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C75D-A Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C75D-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback