Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 30BX001ACA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics40.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 30BX001ACA  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1036
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '22 at 15:47
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2123
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 68.3
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 176
63% 111 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 505
50% 406 Pts
64-Core 556
34% 556 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
Nvidia(10DE 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.3% Average
Lighting 47.9
Reflection 53.6
Parallax 49.7
39% 50.4 fps
MRender 49.2
Gravity 49.3
Splatting 56.5
43% 51.7 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 42%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 1298 1344 1345 1323 1307 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,503
Write 676
Mixed 538
SusWrite 1,181
217% 974 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 38.9
160% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 596
DQ Write 645
DQ Mixed 711
510% 651 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 208%
Great: 306%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965690-002.A00G Hynix HMA82GR7AFR8N-VK 9965690-002.A00G 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.5% Good
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 17
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 8.6
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30BX001ACA Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 30BX001ACA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback