Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 13% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C55D-A-14C (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD PT10AN
Memory	2.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130830
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 16 '22 at 14:29
Run Duration	240 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-2100 APU 4,569 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Memory 21.7 1-Core 14.7 2-Core 29.9 14% 22.1 Pts	4-Core 28.6 8-Core 28.2 4% 28.4 Pts	64-Core 25.9 2% 25.9 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 26%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 8210 4,832 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FA33) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.52% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 1.4 0% 1.27 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 2.1 1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.52% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$32 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 877GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX0A4M SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 92 93 82 68 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 55.7 Write 93.9 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 87.4 49% 67 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 92% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT425S6AFR6A-PB Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 6GB 97 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	8.2% Terrible	MC Read 3 MC Write 2.2 MC Mixed 2.6 7% 2.6 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 3.3 8% 2.87 GB/s	Latency 308 13% 308 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.2% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM