Toshiba TECRA M4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 7% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Toshiba TECRA M4 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1400 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060214
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '17 at 03:33
Run Duration	1026 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium M processor 2.00GHz 9 User benchmarks, average bench 31% uFC-PGA Socket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Memory 31.2 1-Core 8.2 2-Core 7.8 13% 15.7 Pts	4-Core 9.9 8-Core 16 2% 12.9 Pts	64-Core 17.9 1% 17.9 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce Go 6200 TE 64M / 6600 TE 128M 5 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Toshiba(1179 0010) 128MB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 7.15.11.5663 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.05% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 0.35 Parallax 0.06 0% 0.17 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.05% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2010)-$60 12,460 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 213GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 2 (03) Spinup time 178 174 2100 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1551 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5530 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1164 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 14305 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 226 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 185 185 47477 (C2) HDA temperature 110 92 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (F0) Head flying hours 93 93 5115 (F1) Unknown 200 200 16487433953 (F2) Unknown 200 200 20248836560 (FE) Unknown 200 200 0	37.9% Below average	Read 68.6 Write 63.7 Mixed 15.9 36% 49.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 0.36 4K Mixed 0.17 42% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 48%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 248GB 619 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 231GB free, PID 5597 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	8.31% Terrible	Read 30.5 Write 15.1 Mixed 20.1 26% 21.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.97 4K Write 0.05 4K Mixed 0.25 17% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.31% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM SDRAM Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	6.71% Terrible	MC Read 2.8 MC Write 2.2 MC Mixed 1.9 7% 2.3 GB/s	SC Read 0.7 SC Write 0.8 SC Mixed 0.5 2% 0.67 GB/s	Latency 248 16% 248 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.71% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363