Packard dot s

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive20.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard dot s  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard SJE01_CT
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120305
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 29 '22 at 12:41
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N2600
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Memory 34
1-Core 6.3
2-Core 10.8
14% 17 Pts
4-Core 20.4
8-Core 20.8
3% 20.6 Pts
64-Core 20.6
1% 20.6 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 20 40 35 38 90 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.6% Poor
Read 115
Write 86.7
Mixed 102
SusWrite 39.6
19% 86 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 10
36% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 66.7
DQ Write 50.2
DQ Mixed 54.7
42% 57.2 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP594908-HR1-ELD 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 666 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.57 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.77 GB/s
Latency 232
17% 232 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback