Fujitsu CELSIUS M740

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M740 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3348-A2
Memory	39.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160726
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 29 '22 at 21:16
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 3,243 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 76.6 1-Core 42.4 2-Core 142 51% 87.1 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 576 56% 458 Pts	64-Core 581 36% 581 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 84%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256TDL-1AW1ZABFA 256GB 196 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: M5MA000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 301 205 206 196 204 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Read 399 Write 396 Mixed 235 SusWrite 227 70% 314 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 21.9 4K Mixed 17.8 57% 18.3 MB/s	DQ Read 308 DQ Write 323 DQ Mixed 324 241% 319 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 100%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB 97,462 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 271GB free Firmware: 401000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 360 384 396 391 393 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	98.5% Outstanding	Read 454 Write 431 Mixed 321 SusWrite 374 89% 395 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 80.7 4K Mixed 41.5 134% 49.1 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 155 169% 285 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 111%
Hitachi HUS722T1TALA604 1TB 979 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 722GB free Firmware: RR04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 137 148 144 144 144 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	93% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 205 Mixed 97.6 SusWrite 145 114% 156 MB/s	4K Read 6.2 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 1 434% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 111%
Seagate ST2000NM0055-1V4104 2TB 515 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 721GB free Firmware: SD02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 163 163 162 162 163 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 162 Mixed 85.8 SusWrite 161 106% 145 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 1.2 269% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1G43EB1-CRC M393A1G43EB1-CRC M393A1K43BB1-CTD M393A1K43BB1-CTD M393A1G43EB1-CRC M393A1K43BB1-CTD 48GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2400, 2400, 2667, 2667, 2400, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	92.4% Outstanding	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 47.6 MC Mixed 33.9 105% 36.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 13.9 36% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 87 46% 87 ns
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M740 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M740

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples	22x
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples	12x
Xeon E5-1620 v4IntelBench 77%, 3,243 samples	7x

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	13x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	12x
Quadro P5000NvidiaBench 89%, 8,562 samples	7x

SSD
Micron_M600_MTFDDAK256MBFZ 256GBBench 90%, 162 samples	6x
MZ7LN512HCHP-00000 512GBSamsungBench 98%, 467 samples	6x
M4 128GBCrucial $116Bench 60%, 34,516 samples	5x

RAM
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	7x
HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 2x16GBHynixBench 66%, 1,144 samples	4x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16