Acer Nitro AN517-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Nitro AN517-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Superb_CFS
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201117
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateApr 19 '22 at 00:07
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 109
2-Core 183
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 400
38% 316 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1334) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5167
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35% Below average
Lighting 44.1
Reflection 65
Parallax 42.4
36% 50.5 fps
MRender 36.6
Gravity 41.7
Splatting 42.4
33% 40.2 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON RBUSNS8 512GB
428GB free
Firmware: 12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 644 507 489 439 514 510 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 858
Write 912
Mixed 841
SusWrite 517
176% 782 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 38.3
129% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 621
DQ Write 558
DQ Mixed 580
438% 587 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 132%
Great: 157%
Nvme Sabrent Rocket 4 500GB
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 986 499 479 490 501 478 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,476
Write 2,040
Mixed 1,657
SusWrite 572
324% 1,436 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 63.1
208% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 646
DQ Write 584
DQ Mixed 618
462% 616 MB/s
Poor: 186%
This bench: 186%
Great: 389%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
7GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 18 13 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 33.6
Write 22
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 20
33% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 3
213% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD8266.C16FD1 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.2
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.5
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN517-51 Builds (Compare 2,481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN517-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback