Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING H670-PRO WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive336% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING H670-PRO WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '22 at 18:20
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$133
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Memory 80.6
1-Core 181
2-Core 321
104% 194 Pts
4-Core 611
8-Core 972
97% 792 Pts
64-Core 1,231
76% 1,231 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$270
Asus(1043 05D1) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.4.1
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 137
Parallax 245
96% 167 fps
MRender 224
Gravity 125
Splatting 150
134% 166 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$110
307GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1201 1056 1057 1057 1050 1056 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
336% Outstanding
Read 2,881
Write 3,167
Mixed 1,399
SusWrite 1,079
477% 2,132 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 240
4K Mixed 76.1
304% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,761
DQ Write 1,067
DQ Mixed 1,129
918% 1,319 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 336%
Great: 429%
Plextor PX-128S3C 128GB
152GB free
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 97 97 97 98 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 484
Write 427
Mixed 400
SusWrite 116
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 43.6
165% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 239
182% 249 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 92%
Patriot Scorch M2 256GB
101GB free
Firmware: E8FM12.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 895 898 627 262 263 263 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 780
Write 891
Mixed 785
SusWrite 534
169% 748 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 40.2
184% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 708
DQ Write 721
DQ Mixed 598
482% 676 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 151%
Great: 151%
SK hynix SC311 SATA 256GB
164GB free
Firmware: 70000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 239 235 234 237 236 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 456
Mixed 411
SusWrite 269
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 43.2
160% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 324
247% 335 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 100%
Great: 97%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35
199GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 131 143 144 146 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 126
Write 116
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 142
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77%
Great: 107%
Toshiba HDWU110 1TB
502GB free
Firmware: MU2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 140 147 140 132 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 104
Write 98.1
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 142
66% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Essencore Limited KD48GU880-36A180Z 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.3% Outstanding
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 30.1
94% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 25.8
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING H670-PRO WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 1,532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 170%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING H670-PRO WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $787
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback