Today's hottest deals

Notebook W65_67SB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemNotebook W65_67SB  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W65_67SB
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150821
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateMay 18 '22 at 19:02
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$38
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 96
2-Core 186
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 499
52% 418 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 940M
Clevo(1558 6504) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7212
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
9.88% Terrible
Lighting 13.3
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 11.4
11% 13.3 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 13.9
Splatting 9.3
8% 9.73 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.88%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 120GB-$76
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 40 60 35 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 457
Write 257
Mixed 195
SusWrite 72.7
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 18.7
81% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 59
DQ Mixed 73.1
57% 79.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Team-Elite-1333 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 14.8
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE078B
Typical W65_67SB Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W65_67SB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback