Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 14-ck0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 14-ck0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 849E
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210723
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 20 '22 at 23:37
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Memory 18.3
1-Core 10.5
2-Core 45
14% 24.6 Pts
4-Core 37.7
8-Core 38.7
5% 38.2 Pts
64-Core 42.3
3% 42.3 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
HP(103C 849E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.26% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 2.2
2% 1.8 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.2
1% 0.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.26%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 52 54 44 45 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 35.9
Write 37.8
Mixed 11.4
SusWrite 47.9
24% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24%
Great: 63%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
0GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 3.7 2.8 2.8 3.2 3.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
3.52% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 2
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 3.3
7% 7.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.52%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.1% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 4.2
12% 4.37 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 0.4
2% 0.73 GB/s
Latency 334
12% 334 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 14-ck0xxx Builds (Compare 690 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-ck0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback