Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire V3-772

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-772  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA70_HW
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '22 at 12:05
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 171
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 434
47% 374 Pts
64-Core 441
27% 441 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0781) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.34% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 6.7
3% 4.33 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.34%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNS256GMCP 256GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: TA2ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 188 192 191 203 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 348
Write 298
Mixed 302
SusWrite 194
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 41.2
135% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 230
178% 242 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$38
744GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 82 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 56.3
Write 54.5
Mixed 34
SusWrite 80.2
41% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KBG/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
53.6% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 15.6
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 18
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-772 Builds (Compare 422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-772

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback