ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock Z77 Pro4-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Pro4-M (all builds)
Memory	6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130711
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '15 at 07:38
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 89.7 2-Core 179 61% 134 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 449 48% 379 Pts	64-Core 448 28% 448 Pts
Poor: 56% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Gigabyte(1458 3542) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5887 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Lighting 37.3 Reflection 32.5 Parallax 42 30% 37.3 fps	MRender 47.2 Gravity 33 Splatting 35.5 31% 38.6 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team XS1 SSD 120GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: 365A13F0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 100 6343200 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -95081985983736 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2759 (AB) Unknown 0 0 1 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 139 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 1 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 102 100 6343200 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 83 83 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 15040 (EA) Unknown 0 0 6912 (F1) Unknown 0 0 6912 (F2) Unknown 0 0 18112	19.3% Very poor	Read 93.9 Write 38.2 Mixed 58.3 14% 63.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.27 4K Write 37.6 4K Mixed 4.98 36% 16.3 MB/s	DQ Read 75.9 DQ Write 54.6 DQ Mixed 17.7 26% 49.4 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 52%
Seagate ST3500830SCE 500GB 1,034 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 436GB free Firmware: 3.ACD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 91 90 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7589 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 48 34 18941094714711 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 22019 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7903 (BB) vendor-specific 64 64 36 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 80 46 336855060 (C2) HDA temperature 20 54 34359738388 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 97 60 224011401 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 185 10452 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	43.1% Average	Read 75.4 Write 74.7 Mixed 33.2 45% 61.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.42 97% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Z77 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 56%

Gunboat

Desktop

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 43%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Pro4-M

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $50Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	89x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	76x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	58x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	25x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	24x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	21x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	17x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	10x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	8x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 54%, 12,350 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $428

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback