HP EliteBook 745 G5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8.06GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.06GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP EliteBook 745 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83D5
Memory10.3 GB free of 8.0625 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220321
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '22 at 21:34
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U w/ Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 70.1
1-Core 115
2-Core 125
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 509
56% 439 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 10 Graphics
HP(103C 83D5) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.10.26.06
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Lighting 14.5
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 20.8
12% 15.8 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 16.6
Splatting 11.3
10% 12.8 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 12%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD70H1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,060
Write 1,669
Mixed 1198
364% 1,642 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 73
238% 80.9 MB/s
DQ Read 705
DQ Write 407
DQ Mixed 553
412% 555 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 235%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x] Type - [0x00] Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 8GB
3200, 2667 MHz
64, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.5% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 25.2
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 22.3
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 745 G5 Builds (Compare 200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 745 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback