Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400 26,927 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 80.3 1-Core 90 2-Core 192 69% 121 Pts	4-Core 344 8-Core 481 52% 412 Pts	64-Core 477 30% 477 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2100M 6,539 User benchmarks, average bench 7% HP(103C 2254) 2GB CLim: 666 MHz, MLim: 752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 426.25 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	7.3% Terrible	Lighting 8.2 Reflection 9.4 Parallax 11.3 7% 9.63 fps	MRender 11.1 Gravity 11.5 Splatting 9.1 8% 10.6 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.3% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SDLF1DAR-480G-1HA1 412GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 216GB free (System drive) Firmware: ZR11RP41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 308 315 310 180 302 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Read 302 Write 341 Mixed 232 SusWrite 285 65% 290 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 36.6 4K Mixed 25.9 82% 27.2 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 220 DQ Mixed 202 163% 230 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 84%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB 4,330 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 69GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 61 61 61 61 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB M471B1G73QH0-YK0 Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 32GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 16 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 19.7 SC Mixed 19 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 80 50% 80 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2100MNvidiaBench 7%, 6,539 samples	204x
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	97x
Quadro K1100MNvidiaBench 5%, 5,195 samples	95x

SSD
SD7SB2Q-512G-1006 512GBSandiskBench 83%, 1,918 samples	21x
SD6PP4M-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 81%, 1,500 samples	17x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x

RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples	36x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	21x
16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 51%, 8,416 samples	21x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $400