Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Bh
Memory6.6 GB free of 12.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091216
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 30 '22 at 16:16
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$40
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 67
1-Core 83.3
2-Core 140
57% 96.6 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 199
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300
Diamond(1092 E990) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.92% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 0.8
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 1.3
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.7
1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.92%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 128GB-$109
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2333000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 166 161 167 165 167 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.7% Below average
Read 221
Write 171
Mixed 154
SusWrite 163
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 9.9
48% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 72.4
77% 126 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 71%
Hitachi HDS721680PLA380 80GB-$41
14GB free
Firmware: P21OABDA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 67 67 67 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 46.6
Write 42.5
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 66.8
34% 46.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 40%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43
200GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 124 123 125 127 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 128
Write 127
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 124
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:83 0B NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI ID:83 0B NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI ID:80 AD HMT425U6AFR6A-PB ID:80 AD HMT125U6AFP8C-G7 48GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1066, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
28% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 10.5
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 673 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback