Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211012
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 01 '22 at 05:16
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G7400
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 49.8
1-Core 138
2-Core 243
75% 144 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 340
45% 338 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 13.6
12% 13.4 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 12.8
11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1084 1111 165 143 141 157 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1,314
Write 1,493
Mixed 1,389
SusWrite 467
262% 1,166 MB/s
4K Read 51.7
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 67.8
265% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1160
DQ Write 545
DQ Mixed 756
586% 820 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 200%
Great: 295%
Kingston SNVSE1000G 1TB
469GB free
Firmware: EDFK5N0B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1407 1406 1396 1410 1399 1394 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 836
Write 1,410
Mixed 974
SusWrite 1,402
263% 1,156 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 209
4K Mixed 61.9
251% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 613
DQ Write 895
DQ Mixed 712
550% 740 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 229%
Great: 280%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 141 140 138 140 142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 109
Write 102
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 138
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 71%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 122 124 123 122 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 73.6
Write 111
Mixed 65.4
SusWrite 121
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 70%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41
423GB free
Firmware: SM36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 94 93 94 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
53% Above average
Read 89.6
Write 81.9
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 93.7
60% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.9
364% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 53%
Great: 65%
TOSHIBA USB FLASH DRIVE 32GB
4GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 17 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 27.1
Mixed 14
SusWrite 12.7
27% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
66% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 22%
BUFFALO HD-PCTU3 1TB
463GB free, PID 01de
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 38 38 39 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 39.1
Write 29.1
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 38.5
47% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 16ATF2G64AZ-2G1B1 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
32.8% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 10.4
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 10.1
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 2,318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $491
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback