Apple iMac20,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple iMac20,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-CFF7D910A743CAAF
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '22 at 19:43
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K-$175
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 85.7
1-Core 146
2-Core 293
95% 175 Pts
4-Core 573
8-Core 1,020
96% 797 Pts
64-Core 1,465
91% 1,465 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Apple(106B 0218) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.50.32.02
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49% Average
Lighting 65.4
Reflection 57.1
Parallax 102
53% 74.9 fps
MRender 47
Gravity 68.6
Splatting 37.6
41% 51.1 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk Extreme Pro 55AF 1TB
834GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1085
SusWrite @10s intervals: 687 665 677 670 725 752 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.9% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 22
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 24.8
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac20,1 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

System: Apple iMac20,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback