Freebsd BHYVE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFreebsd BHYVE  (all builds)
MotherboardFreeBSD BHYVE
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '22 at 23:18
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5
CPU #0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
45% Average
Memory 56.6
1-Core 81.3
2-Core 177
57% 105 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 196
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 203
12% 203 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45%
Great: 77%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Bhyve SATA DISK 107GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 112 32 30 46 69 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 29% Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
34.5% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 10.9
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.4
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback