Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics84% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '22 at 19:38
Run Duration876 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$73
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 78.8
1-Core 56.5
2-Core 117
52% 84.2 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 138
18% 138 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 110
Parallax 99.6
85% 105 fps
MRender 93.8
Gravity 103
Splatting 99.9
81% 99 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.0
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 9.5
Mixed 12.7
9% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 69%
WD Elements 10B8 500GB
242GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 20 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 20.2
Write 19.7
Mixed 17.6
SusWrite 20.6
27% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
93% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D169DS3.16FE BLS8G3D169DS3.16FE 16GB
1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
35% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 12.3
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9.9
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-GS4 FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback