Today's hottest deals

Samsung 275E4E/275E5E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 275E4E/275E5E  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP275E5V-K04AE
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '22 at 15:20
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-2000 APU (2012 M.Za)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
28.9% Poor
Memory 51.6
1-Core 20
2-Core 39.2
26% 36.9 Pts
4-Core 38.7
8-Core 39.9
5% 39.3 Pts
64-Core 39.7
2% 39.7 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7340
Sanyo(144D C680) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 9.12.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.2% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 0.9
2% 1.33 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 0.8
1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.2%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 71 71 48 71 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 100
Write 99.3
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 66.1
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.57 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 3.2
7% 2.43 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 275E4E/275E5E Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 275E4E/275E5E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback