Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

23 months ago, 23 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Westmere E56xx/L56xx/X56xx (Nehalem-C) 52 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 0, 8 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	Memory 20.6 1-Core 47.4 2-Core 105 30% 57.6 Pts	4-Core 154 8-Core 279 26% 217 Pts	64-Core 241 15% 241 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 65%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 550GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 432GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 14 19 29 13 65 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 18.7 Write 9.9 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 26.7 16% 20.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 44% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Red Hat 4x16GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	41.2% Average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 14.7 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 0 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 0 3% 1.13 GB/s	Latency 316 13% 316 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 158%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 26%

Raft

CPU
Xeon (Skylake, IBRS)IntelBench 47%, 139 samples	1x

GPU
GRID P100X-4QNvidiaBench 49%, 1 sample	1x

SSD
HARDDISK 161GBQemuBench 47%, 23 samples	1x

RAM
22GBQEMUBench 79%, 50 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16