Emaxx EMX-A320-GAMING +

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemEmaxx EMX-A320-GAMING +  (all builds)
MotherboardEMAXX EMX-A320-GAMING +
Memory1.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190529
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 15 '22 at 11:04
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.5% Below average
Memory 32.7
1-Core 79
2-Core 146
45% 86.1 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 260
34% 257 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6500-XT-$140
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Lighting 65.2
Reflection 77.4
Parallax 128
53% 90.3 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 72
Splatting 82.4
72% 89.2 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 362
Write 325
Mixed 103
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 25
81% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 105
118% 199 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 82%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
423GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 159 160 160 160 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 156
Write 161
Mixed 35.4
SusWrite 157
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
28% Poor
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 9.1
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 7.8
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 239
17% 239 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EMX-A320-GAMING + Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Emaxx EMX-A320-GAMING +

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $103
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback