MSI MS-14D1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMicro-Star Modern 14 B10MW
MotherboardMSI MS-14D1  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201222
Uptime64 Days
Run DateJul 19 '22 at 13:43
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%
CPU Throttled 80%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 40.3
2-Core 96
44% 69 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 177
22% 170 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12C1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
3.35% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 3.6
3% 3.33 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 3.7
Splatting 6.2
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.35%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3128B-AI1 128GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 339 270 145 141 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 559
Write 269
Mixed 381
SusWrite 235
80% 361 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 26.2
82% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 97.5
DQ Mixed 148
113% 157 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 184%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.7% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 10.1
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-14D1 Builds (Compare 310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-14D1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback