Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2PV-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	58.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago.

System	Gigabyte H110M-S2PV
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2PV-CF (all builds)
Memory	8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161108
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Jul 22 '22 at 17:34
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6100-$40 110,166 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Memory 81.3 1-Core 42.9 2-Core 76.4 46% 66.9 Pts	4-Core 126 8-Core 170 19% 148 Pts	64-Core 167 10% 167 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Gigabyte(1458 401A) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.96 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	58.6% Above average	Lighting 75.7 Reflection 77.6 Parallax 73.5 62% 75.6 fps	MRender 64.9 Gravity 70.5 Splatting 59.4 53% 64.9 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD220 240GB-$35 12,548 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 136GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0510A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 100 109 54 66 13 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Read 449 Write 406 Mixed 393 SusWrite 113 76% 340 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 72.7 4K Mixed 24.4 115% 42.3 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 39.8 91% 185 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 93%
Toshiba DT01ABA100V 1TB 5,116 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 787GB free Firmware: MU2OA720 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 123 122 122 123 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	65% Good	Read 105 Write 115 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 122 66% 91.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 12,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	63.5% Good	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 21.2 66% 23.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 20.3 SC Mixed 15.3 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 78.2 51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-S2PV-CF Builds (Compare 676 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2PV-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	99x
Core i3-6100Intel $40Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	90x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	79x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	67x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	65x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	55x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	19x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	21x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GBCorsair $25Bench 42%, 47,473 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $182

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16