Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 540 8,329 User benchmarks, average bench 41% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	Memory 46.9 1-Core 56.9 2-Core 100 40% 67.9 Pts	4-Core 126 8-Core 147 18% 137 Pts	64-Core 152 9% 152 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 48%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD1600BJKT-75F4T0 160GB 894 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11.01A11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 25 24 23 22 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 37.1 Write 44.3 Mixed 27.6 SusWrite 26.3 25% 33.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 46%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 32GB 4,247 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 13GB free, PID 5597 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 6.3 2.5 4.3 9.7 6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	8.22% Terrible	Read 27.2 Write 15 Mixed 16.9 SusWrite 6.5 20% 16.4 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 2 103% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.22% Great: 27%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8KTF25664HZ-1G4K1 80CE M471B5273EB0-CK0 6GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.9% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 8.8 22% 7.7 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6.3 17% 5.83 GB/s	Latency 172 23% 172 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 22%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
NVS 3100MNvidiaBench 1%, 9,073 samples	396x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	16x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	1x

RAM
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 33%, 8,194 samples	32x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 41%, 10,285 samples	20x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	20x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $98

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16