Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory121.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '22 at 00:21
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User JOR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 32-Cores
SP3, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 65.4
1-Core 146
2-Core 293
88% 168 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 1,020
95% 791 Pts
64-Core 5595
346% 5595 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 8000
Nvidia(10DE 129E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 48GB, Driver: 516.59
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
5.01% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 6
5% 5.4 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 6.1
5% 6.5 fps
Poor: 132%
This bench: 5.01%
Great: 173%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
829GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1689 1709 1712 1712 1723 1747 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 1,198
Write 1,722
Mixed 1,281
SusWrite 1,716
336% 1,479 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 77.8
274% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 710
DQ Write 949
DQ Mixed 878
650% 846 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 274%
Great: 299%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
3.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6655 6706 6702 6695 6700 6697 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
827% Outstanding
Read 6670
Write 6,598
Mixed 4,720
SusWrite 6,692
1,390% 6,170 MB/s
4K Read 71.1
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 106
332% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,255
DQ Write 905
DQ Mixed 1042
789% 1,067 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 827%
Great: 477%
Hitachi HUH728080ALE601 8TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: A4GL0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 198 197 192 199 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 195
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 194
119% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1
232% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 111%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HUH728080ALE601 8TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: A4GL0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 183 180 189 189 194 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 178
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 187
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.8
223% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 106%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HUS726060ALA640 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: AHGNT1EN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 167 165 164 164 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 151
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 165
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 101%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 248GB
231GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 31 18 20 29 7.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.78% Terrible
Read 24.1
Write 9.5
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 19.4
21% 16.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
33% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.78%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-32GTZN 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 18.4
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 48%
Great: 172%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 319%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback