Koloe X58

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Intel Thurley
Motherboard	Koloe X58 (all builds)
Memory	6.7 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170331
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '17 at 17:46
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5570-$70 1,343 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 95 1-Core 74.1 2-Core 148 65% 106 Pts	4-Core 272 8-Core 377 41% 324 Pts	64-Core 377 23% 377 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS 18,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 256MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.59% Terrible	Lighting 0.63 Reflection 1.27 Parallax 0.22 0% 0.71 fps	MRender 1.43 Gravity 0.43 Splatting 0.87 1% 0.91 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.59% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 902GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1AA01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 98 0 (03) Spinup time 75 75 8250 (04) Start/Stop count 86 86 14256 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 16562 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 87 87 13327 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 98 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 39 (B8) Unknown 1 1 449 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 179 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 58 420216857 (C2) HDA temperature 68 56 537657376 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 1966434 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 95 2425 (C8) Write error rate 100 99 2 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0	61.1% Good	Read 107 Write 106 Mixed 37.9 61% 83.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 2.13 4K Mixed 0.42 118% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 62%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 11GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	7.21% Terrible	Read 28.2 Write 8.73 Mixed 8.32 15% 15.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.02 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.009 19% 1.68 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.21% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. MXIC 25L8005 37GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1600, 33 MHz 4096, 33792 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	45.9% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 14.2 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 13.2 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 57.2 70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 510 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Koloe X58

CPU
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples	88x
Xeon X5660IntelBench 71%, 6,950 samples	78x
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples	58x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	34x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	31x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	30x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	25x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	17x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	13x

RAM
MXIC 25L8005 41GBUnknownBench 36%, 466 samples	194x
MXIC 25L8005 37GBUnknownBench 37%, 309 samples	89x
25L8005 1x33GBMXICBench 23%, 218 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359