Today's hottest deals

VIA ARTiGO A1250

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardVIA ARTiGO A1250  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20171120
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 31 '22 at 01:06
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
VIA Eden X4 C4250@1.2+GHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.1% Below average
Memory 56.4
1-Core 20.2
2-Core 36.5
28% 37.7 Pts
4-Core 59.8
8-Core 58.6
8% 59.2 Pts
64-Core 59.3
4% 59.3 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Via/s3g C-645/640 GPU
Device(1106 3A01) 256MB
Driver: S3EDX9L_64.dll Ver. 10.18.16.219
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
0.42% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.6 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.3
1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.42%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 128GB-$30
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427AC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 224 222 225 231 223 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.3% Good
Read 253
Write 237
Mixed 236
SusWrite 225
54% 238 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 31.7
104% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 173
132% 178 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 3.5
10% 3.47 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 4.6
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ARTiGO A1250 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: VIA ARTiGO A1250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback