Today's hottest deals

Microsoft Surface Pro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicrosoft Surface Pro  (all builds)
MotherboardMicrosoft Surface Pro
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2736 x 1824 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 31 '22 at 02:32
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7660U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Memory 46.4
1-Core 54
2-Core 85.5
37% 62 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 146
16% 128 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 640 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Microsoft(1414 0026) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
5.95% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 7.5
6% 6.7 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 6.9
6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.95%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung KUS040202M-B000 512GB
246GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXY8AM1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 178 194 232 208 325 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 529
Write 431
Mixed 354
SusWrite 226
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 30.5
94% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 188
131% 165 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 170%
USB FLASH DRIVE 16GB
10GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 9.2 8.8 9.3 8.8 8.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
7.49% Terrible
Read 23.6
Write 8.4
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 8.7
14% 12.5 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
52% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.49%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
53.4% Above average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 13.2
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 9.7
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Surface Pro Builds (Compare 2,444 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Microsoft Surface Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback