Today's hottest deals

Samsung R580/R590

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSamsung R580/R590  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R580/R590
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '22 at 11:30
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User MUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 430
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 61.6
2-Core 120
49% 82.4 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 141
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 73
4% 73 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310M
Sanyo(144D C06A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.95
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.88% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 0.4
1% 1.33 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.88%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
648GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 80 90 88 92 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
52% Above average
Read 96.5
Write 80.8
Mixed 31
SusWrite 84.8
53% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52%
Great: 57%
Philips USB Flash Drive 32GB
10GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 5.3 4.3 6.1 3.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Read 11.3
Write 1.3
Mixed 8.3
SusWrite 4
7% 6.23 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
24.7% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 10.5
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R580/R590 Builds (Compare 135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R580/R590

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback