Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite A200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive11.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite A200  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA ISKAE
Memory2.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070821
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '22 at 01:21
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 T7200-$90
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Memory 67
1-Core 25.8
2-Core 50.4
34% 47.7 Pts
4-Core 50.1
8-Core 51.3
7% 50.7 Pts
64-Core 51
3% 51 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce Go 7300
Toshiba(1179 FF02) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 7.15.11.7976
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.05% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.3 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.05%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 53 65 53 44 43 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.5% Very poor
Read 106
Write 87.6
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 49.9
16% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 4.2
14% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3
10% 3.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 2.7
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite A200 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite A200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $143
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback