Today's hottest deals

MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7693
MotherboardMSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '22 at 03:03
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.5% Below average
Memory 61.9
1-Core 23.7
2-Core 43
31% 42.9 Pts
4-Core 83.7
8-Core 127
13% 106 Pts
64-Core 138
9% 138 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
Sapphire(174B E322) 2GB
CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 27.1
Parallax 28.8
18% 25.9 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 22
Splatting 24.8
20% 23.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 115 153 98 131 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 395
Write 350
Mixed 328
SusWrite 151
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 21.2
4K Mixed 16.8
57% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 31.7
DQ Mixed 25.7
35% 68.5 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
30.9% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 12.6
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 8
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 GAMING (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 2,361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $244
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback