Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FAC_X412FA

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FAC_X412FA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X412FAC
Memory	2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191210
Uptime	2.5 Days
Run Date	Aug 28 '22 at 05:27
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	11%
CPU Throttled	76%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10210U 54,859 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 91.9 2-Core 163 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 241 8-Core 316 36% 279 Pts	64-Core 318 20% 318 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 110,580 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1DE1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9268 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	4.21% Terrible	Lighting 5.7 Reflection 3.8 Parallax 6.6 5% 5.37 fps	MRender 7.9 Gravity 5.9 Splatting 0.3 3% 4.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.21% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme HFM256GDJTNG-831 256GB 3,461 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80001C00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 260 250 248 239 235 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Read 316 Write 282 Mixed 367 SusWrite 259 69% 306 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 78.4 4K Mixed 38.5 143% 50.4 MB/s	DQ Read 493 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 316 256% 368 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 152%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 14GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Read 16.9 Write 18.7 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 11.3 21% 15.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 2 178% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATE51264HZ-2G6E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2800, 2667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	61.7% Good	MC Read 24.5 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 18.7 61% 21.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 22.4 SC Mixed 20.1 56% 19.6 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FAC_X412FA Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FAC_X412FA

CPU
Core i5-10210UIntelBench 53%, 54,859 samples	51x
Core i3-10110UIntelBench 47%, 11,481 samples	42x
Core i7-10510UIntelBench 56%, 51,080 samples	3x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 110,580 samples	96x

SSD
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	62x
HFM256GDJTNG-831 256GBNvmeBench 128%, 3,461 samples	14x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	3x

RAM
4ATE51264HZ-2G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 37%, 121 samples	24x
4ATE51264HZ-2G6E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBMicronBench 61%, 102 samples	21x
4ATE51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBMicronBench 62%, 66 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16