Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics94.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus Z9PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory45.9 GB free of 56 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150610
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 14 '22 at 21:17
Run Duration296 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 61.8
1-Core 76.2
2-Core 187
59% 108 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 693
62% 521 Pts
64-Core 1,736
107% 1,736 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
EVGA(3842 5678) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.3% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 129
Parallax 115
97% 121 fps
MRender 91.5
Gravity 124
Splatting 108
89% 108 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 500GB
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 447
Write 424
Mixed 397
94% 423 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 35.8
118% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 118%
HP 365GB MLC PCIe ioDrive2 for ProLiant Servers 365GB
278GB free
Firmware: 7.1.15 rev 110356 Public Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 637
Write 503
Mixed 475
120% 538 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 26.1
89% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 442
DQ Mixed 144
183% 323 MB/s
Poor: 101% Great: 151%
Fusion-io ioScale 1.30TB
85GB free
Firmware: 7.1.17 rev 116786 Public
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 974
Write 734
Mixed 715
179% 808 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 26
89% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 439
DQ Write 497
DQ Mixed 281
263% 406 MB/s
Poor: 85% Great: 94%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
46GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 420
Write 400
Mixed 379
89% 400 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 25.7
85% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 304
226% 299 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
2TB free
Firmware: AB51
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 118
Write 116
Mixed 67.9
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 68%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$110
5TB free
Firmware: 0A82
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 167
Write 158
Mixed 90.1
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 99%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$66
2TB free
Firmware: AB51
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 125
Write 113
Mixed 72.4
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
WD Re 2TB-$38
2TB free
Firmware: 1D02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 137
Write 127
Mixed 104
92% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 83%
WD Re 2TB-$38
2TB free
Firmware: 1D02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 142
Write 140
Mixed 99
95% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 83%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$25
2TB free
Firmware: 1K03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 158
Write 151
Mixed 105
103% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7EFR4C-R 7x8GB
7 of 8 slots used
56GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
76.1% Very good
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 28.3
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 7.5
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $321
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback