Gigabyte GA-AORUS 17 XE4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive370% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 89% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AORUS 17 XE4  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220307
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 07 '22 at 12:10
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 89%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 71.3
1-Core 179
2-Core 356
105% 202 Pts
4-Core 670
8-Core 1,116
109% 893 Pts
64-Core 2,034
126% 2,034 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 102%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 79AD) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3301
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Lighting 26.1
Reflection 30
Parallax 28.9
21% 28.3 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 35.2
Splatting 22.6
22% 28.1 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 21%
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti (Laptop)
Gigabyte(1458 79AD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1785 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 194
Parallax 179
147% 185 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 139
Splatting 121
121% 152 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 131%
Great: 135%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
236GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1384 1176 1162 1156 1166 1170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 1,838
Write 1,733
Mixed 733
SusWrite 1,202
308% 1,377 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 63.2
237% 94.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,481
DQ Write 1,263
DQ Mixed 1,065
882% 1,270 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 280%
Great: 302%
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 1TB
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIOM31.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3159 998 968 884 855 833 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
370% Outstanding
Read 2,426
Write 3,308
Mixed 2,386
SusWrite 1,283
530% 2,351 MB/s
4K Read 70.5
4K Write 267
4K Mixed 118
399% 152 MB/s
DQ Read 1928
DQ Write 1,233
DQ Mixed 1,568
1,173% 1,577 MB/s
Poor: 239%
This bench: 370%
Great: 482%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
337GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 368 361 362 375 385 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 347
Write 336
Mixed 324
SusWrite 371
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 26.3
84% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 124
102% 146 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 133%
Samsung MZ7WD960HMHP-000 960GB
749GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 348 342 342 355 364 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 262
Write 277
Mixed 237
SusWrite 350
64% 282 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 27.1
4K Mixed 18.4
60% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 199
140% 177 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.C8FR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 37.2
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 37.8
SC Mixed 24.4
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AORUS 17 XE4 Builds (Compare 213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AORUS 17 XE4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback