Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

18 months ago, 18 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10210Y 115 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	Memory 45.3 1-Core 67.5 2-Core 42.4 35% 51.7 Pts	4-Core 79.6 8-Core 103 12% 91.2 Pts	64-Core 132 8% 132 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 218 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Intel(8086 87CA) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	2.15% Terrible	Lighting 2.5 Reflection 2.6 Parallax 2.4 2% 2.5 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 2.4 2% 3 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.15% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD_M.2_PCI_NVME_256GB_InnovationIT 256GB 182 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 179GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0918A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 511 524 517 253 330 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	97.4% Outstanding	Read 883 Write 428 Mixed 653 SusWrite 396 131% 590 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 54.5 4K Mixed 16.8 92% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 228 DQ Mixed 242 182% 243 MB/s
Poor: 112% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 182%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 2x4GB 26,293 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	45.7% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 18.6 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 8.5 22% 7.87 GB/s	Latency 179 22% 179 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 81%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16