HP All-in-One Desktop 24-cb1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP All-in-One Desktop 24-cb1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 89DC
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '22 at 01:48
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 5425U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 71.2
1-Core 150
2-Core 288
90% 170 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 598
72% 552 Pts
64-Core 615
38% 615 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 89DC) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.40.38
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 12.1
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 18.3
10% 12.9 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 16
11% 12.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HBJD-00BH1 256GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1NFAV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1042 928 833 588 174 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,171
Write 1,002
Mixed 1,150
SusWrite 626
222% 987 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 59.5
197% 68.2 MB/s
DQ Read 856
DQ Write 630
DQ Mixed 744
556% 743 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 180%
Great: 200%
WD WD10SPSX-60A6WT0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 138 136 140 138 138 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 43% Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
40.1% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 11.5
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 16.2
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical All-in-One Desktop 24-cb1xxx Builds (Compare 114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP All-in-One Desktop 24-cb1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback